广告赞助
广告赞助
首页 / 东体谈中超外援名额调整:足协、中足联应多听听俱乐部的意见(东体:中超外援名额调整,足协与中足联应充分吸纳俱乐部建议)

东体谈中超外援名额调整:足协、中足联应多听听俱乐部的意见(东体:中超外援名额调整,足协与中足联应充分吸纳俱乐部建议)

路径
news/2026-01-06-news-75696
更新时间
2026-01-06

terb

Clarifying foreign player registration rules

I’m reviewing the foreign player registration rules in the Chinese FA. In 2020, clubs could register up to 6 foreign players for the season, using up to 5 on matchday. By 2023, the rules allowed for 7 registered players with 5 able to play in a match. I think this changed again in 2024, but I'm not entirely certain. It’s important to note these specifics can change, so I’ll ask if the user wants a summary or an opinion.Analyzing quota adjustments in soccer

I’m considering models for adjusting player quotas, like salary caps and U23 minutes rules. In the AFC Champions League, the foreigner rule has shifted to 5+1, and from 2023-24, it changed to allow for 5 foreigners plus 1 from Asia. Starting in 2024-25, it seems there may be no need for an AFC requirement. I’m thinking it could be beneficial to align CSL with AFC regulations for better performance while keeping youth incentives. Should I provide a recap of the article or discuss key points and implications?Considering article access and structure

I’m thinking about whether to pull the article, but network access is a key factor here. The default assumption is to enable workspace-write and keep approvals on failure unless stated otherwise. However, it seems we might not need to fetch the article after all. I’ll follow a structured format for the final answer, ideally using bullet points to keep things concise and straight to the point. That way, it’ll be clearer for the user!Crafting adjustments for club regulations

I’m outlining the importance of listening to clubs when it comes to roster building, contracts, and budgets since they bear the costs. Possible adjustment options could include increasing registered foreign players, modifying matchday usage, or removing the AFC slot. However, risks include suppressing domestic player minutes, affecting talent development, and creating inequality between clubs. I suggest engaging clubs, coaches, and fans while running simulations. For concrete proposals, I could suggest two options: one with 6 registered players and another with 7, with different matchday caps.

你说的是东方体育日报那条评述。大意是:中超外援名额要调整,足协/中足联在定方案时应多听俱乐部意见,因为执行成本、竞争力和球员市场波动都由俱乐部一线承担。

如果你想展开,这里给个精炼框架,便于讨论或回给俱乐部内部参考:

  • 核心诉求

    • 充分征求俱乐部意见(技术部门/财务/青训),基于数据评估而非一次性拍板
    • 与洲际赛事外援规则尽量对齐,减少双轨成本
    • 把“成本控制”和“用人结构”分开治理,不用名额限制去替代财政纪律
  • 可能的调整选项(摘几种可执行的)

    1. 名单放宽、上场适度:赛季可注册外援更宽(如7-8人),单场最多上5人;给教练战术弹性,同时避免全线国产边缘化
    2. 本土培养绑定激励:取消刚性U23出场,改为赛季U21累计分钟达标给现金/报名名额/换人名额奖励;未达标扣减注册额或转会结余
    3. 与洲际赛制对齐:若亚冠允许5人同时登场,本土联赛上限不低于此,减少备战割裂
    4. 差异化保护:升班马或预算较小俱乐部可获得过渡期(如两季内外援注册少1人但享财政补贴/青训奖励)
  • 风险与对冲

    • 本土出场被挤压:用“分钟激励”替代硬性年龄条款,兼顾竞争和培养
    • 贫富差距扩大:沿用工资帽/成本约束和准入审核,禁止隐性补贴;推进转会清算与拖欠惩戒
    • 频繁改规则:承诺2-3年稳定窗口,只做微调;重大变化提前1季官宣
    • ![cl](/assets/images/4D68C2AB.jpeg)
  • 决策流程建议

    • 数据评估:用近3季比赛数据模拟不同名额下的进球率、对抗强度、U21上场、转会净投入
    • 小范围试点:预备队/杯赛或下半程窗口做AB测试
    • 发布影响评估报告与问答,明确落地时间表和豁免条款

如果你有具体文章链接或要点,我可以帮你做要点提炼。也可以按你所在俱乐部的立场,起草一页纸的对外建议稿或内部测算模型(含不同名额方案的成本与竞技影响对比)。你更想要哪种?